By David M. Greenwald
No amount of money will bring back Miles Hall, a young man shot and killed by Walnut Creek police in June 2019, the family said on Monday at a press conference in front of their home. Hall had a known mental health problem but the family believes that the police, instead of de-escalating the situation, used deadly force.
The $4 million settlement, the family and attorney John Burris stressed, will not bring back their beloved son, but they do hope by creating a foundation they can help others avoid the same fate.
“The importance of this case cannot be understated,” John Burris said. “The issue of the policing of the mentally impaired is one that always leads to dire consequences. Rarely have we had a case where a mentally impaired person’s family has called for help and the person didn’t end up getting shot 
and killed by the police.”
He said while this case happened before the George Floyd case, it has had the same dramatic impact in terms of the impact on the community of Walnut Creek.
“This was such a shocking blueprint for a person who is a well-known member of this community, shot down under the circumstances that we have alleged in the complaint—that it was an unnecessary use-of-force death. It was a failure to deescalate and they really treated him more as a criminal rather than a mentally impaired person,” Burris explained.
The police knew he was suffering from mental illness. “But yet the consequences were very much the same as what happens to lots of other people.”
The lawsuit was filed in 2019 and alleged that the Walnut Creek police officers violated Miles Hall’s civil rights, by using excessive force in shooting him dead when he was operating under a mental crisis.
All parties agreed to the settlement.
“For us it was an opportunity to look at how the mentally impaired are policed and because this city and other cities (need) to re-calculate how they allocate resources, how they deploy individuals to handle the mentally impaired,” Burris added.
Taun Hall, the mother of Miles Hall, said, “This was never about money for us. When Miles was shot and killed right behind our house—it was the horror that this happened to us where we live here in Walnut Creek.”
Hall explained that they had made relations over two years with the police in town in helping their son deal with his mental illness.
“This system is so broken,” she said. “This system is so broken that now our son Miles is dead. He is dead at the hands of police and he is dead at a system that didn’t allow our family or Miles an ability to have a normal life.
“We are heartbroken, we are devastated,” she said. “The lawsuit is because we wanted to be sure that people know Mile’s name. (We) wanted to be sure that people knew that Miles (was) not a criminal, that he (was) a loving child. He had goals and aspirations just like your children do. it’s important for us, that it can help us so that we can help save someone from this happening again.”
“Miles should have never died,” she said. “He was in a mental health crisis and a mental health crisis should not be a death sentence.”
She explained that they have created the Miles Hall Foundation to help achieve these goals and to create lasting positive change in our son’s name. They want to make it possible that those suffering from mental illness should not have to use police resources—“they have never come. They’re not trained to come. As a result we see what happened to Miles.
“Now with the foundation and our settlement, we plan on working towards those goals,” she said. “We really appreciate the community supporting us in this, because this could have been your child.”
Hall pointed out, “We are living the American dream here, in Walnut Creek, a Black family, (but) it wasn’t. It has not been in the American dream. It has been a nightmare.
“It happened to ours, it can happen to yours,” she said. “This is not justice here for Miles today. We will have justice when we have other ways our loved ones can get help so they don’t have to call the police.”
Scott Hall also spoke, noting their daughter Alexis recently graduated from San Diego State.
“This is a situation that never had to happen,” he said. “It was definitely an overreaction by the police when they came to address Miles and consequently shot him.
“All we cared about from the day Miles died until the day we die is having a better system in place,” he said. “We are going to make it so that people suffering from a mental health crisis do not have to go through what Miles went through—that they can get the appropriate health and response when needed.”
John Burris stated that this case is unusual because it presents the opportunity to really have an impact on the community greater than the impact of the case itself.
They are really pushing the idea of reimagining the police. Taun Hall noted the Cahoots model out of Oregon which, for 30 years in Eugene, has allowed for an innovative community-based public safety system to provide mental health first response for crises involving mental illness, homelessness, and addiction without the need to bring armed law enforcement into a volatile situation.
Taun Hall explained, “Now the city is trying to partner with 18 other cities within the county to create a non-police response.” She said, “We’re trying to do a coalition of cities along with the county to create a 24-7 non-police response for the mentally ill.”
Walnut Creek has set aside funds to help create this program, the Halls said.
Taun Hall said that they have been working with NAMI in Contra Costa County, and they said “a lot of families don’t want to call the police because of what happened to Miles. They’re afraid—as they should be.”
“At this point there is no alternative to the police when you need help,” Scott Hall said.
John Burris said that, in this case, “there has been no effort to hold anyone accountable for what happened” and “there was no critical analysis or critical review of what they actually did.”
He believes it would improve the relationship between the police and community “if they were upfront and clear about their responsibilities and the misconduct that the officers were engaged in.”
He said without that, you don’t really correct their behavior.
There are conflicting accounts of what occurred on that fateful day in June 2019. The family called 911 saying that Miles was behaving erratically. He was running around and carrying a pry bar. The family says that, instead of officers de-escalating the situation, they opened fire.
Officers say Hall was charging at them. But Hall’s family says he was just running around the officers. They don’t believe he posed a true threat to the police that day.
—David M. Greenwald reporting
To sign up for our new newsletter – Everyday Injustice – https://tinyurl.com/yyultcf9
I watched the video of this shooting. He charged the officers with a sharp edged crow bar. Both his mother and his grandmother called 911 saying their son/grandson was breaking in and threatening them. The officers tried to stop Hall at first with 6 bean bag rounds but when that didn’t deter him they fired two shots. I don’t understand why the $4 million payout, maybe Walnut Creek didn’t want possible riots, looting and burning?
“The officers tried to stop Hall at first with 6 bean bag rounds but when that didn’t deter him they fired two shots. ”
This is the problem right here. The police came in hot rather than attempting to de-escalate. That’s why a lot of people in the mental health community want to see alternatives to the police. Look at the 30 year track record in Eugene of CAHOOTS for example.
There are all sorts of problems here. First, you don’t see the leadup in the video. Also, I’m not convinced he was charging rather than attempting to run away. And he wasn’t exactly brandishing the crow bar in an offensive position. It also appears that they put themselves into the position where he was a potential threat. I think the payout is due to the fact that they went in hot rather than attempting de-escalation tactics.
He ran at the cops, not away from them in the video I saw. I wouldn’t want to be a mental health responder without police backup in that situation. Talk about a dangerous job.
First of all, he ran near the cops. Second, he had the crow bar facing down, not in an offensive position. And third, why are they in the street to begin with. The real place where this goes wrong is not necessarily at the point where he was shot, but rather getting to that point. They mishandled it.
Your opinion only. They were in the street because they were approaching the house where he was threatening people. Where did you want the cops to go, away from where he was possibly going to harm someone?
Others hold that view to.
“Where did you want the cops to go, away from where he was possibly going to harm someone?”
I really suggest you educate yourself on the CAHOOTS model. It has worked for a long time and it is a model Davis and other cities are looking at.
CAHOOTS wasn’t an option here, the cops had to deal with it.
Keith, David… a humble suggestion… agree to disagree, or get a (chat) room… you will apparently never convince one another, and not likely any other reader…
It is what it is… I suspect WC did not believe it was 100% in the right, or they would not have settled… they probably weighed ‘risk’ in defending a civil suit… I suspect the family friends did not believe that WC was 100% responsible, or they would not have settled…
9.4 on the pun . . . otherwise . . . you don’t have to read . . . please, DG and KO, continue to disagree and argue with each other 😐