Today, Public Defender Lisa Lance filed a motion in regard to the sentencing phase of her client, Thomas Vukodinovich. Mr. Vukodinovich was convicted of several dozen counts of sexual misconduct with a disabled woman.
Jurors held him accountable for becoming involved with a mentally-handicapped woman. Mr. Vukodinovich was the bus driver in charge of transporting disabled individuals to work.
On Monday afternoon, 29-year-old Davis resident Aquelin Talamantes was arraigned, accused of murdering her five-year-old daughter. Her daughter was found in her car trunk in Sacramento, in response to a child welfare call. The details of this incident are as yet largely unknown.
Ms.Talamantes had a large support network attending her arraignment Monday, with five to eight women being part of the party that got up and left as soon as her proceedings concluded.
The New York Times is reporting that the Innocence Project today will ask Texas Governor Rick Perry “to order the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to investigate whether the state should posthumously pardon Mr. Willingham [Cameron Todd Willingham], whose 2004 execution has become a lightning rod of controversy over the Texas justice system.”
“This is a terrible thing to not only execute somebody who was innocent; this is an individual who lost his three children,” said Barry Scheck, co-founder of the Innocence Project.
In September of 2011, Aristeo Vasquez-Munoz was arrested and charged with battery, resisting arrest, hitting a woman holding a child, and child abuse. During a commotion following a confrontation on the street, police officers badly beat Mr. Vasquez-Munoz, who suffered severe bruising to his legs.
By the time the case finally went to trial two years later, only the resisting arrest charge remained. A jury after a few hours of deliberation found him guilty of the misdemeanor, and he received one year of probation and an $865 fine.
It was a tragic accident on I-5 in Woodland on August 8, 2011, that left three people dead and seven others with serious injuries. The Yolo County District Attorney’s office put the blame on “one man and one man only,” Gubani Roderico Rosales Quinteros. The 42-year-old faced three felony counts of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence.
After a juror hung the trial the first time, the case went to a court trial back in July, with Judge Mock ruling in favor of vehicular manslaughter but without the gross negligence charges.
By Dan WilliamsLast week summed up the trial of one Casey Humphrey. Casey is an adult living with Paranoid Schizophrenia. When he was young, 10 years ago, he would get into fights with his father. It was during one of these particularly volatile episodes that he inflicted stab wounds on his father. His father was treated and released. Casey was not so lucky. Casey was charged with enough to land him a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
At this point Mr. Humphrey had a choice, he could go to trial, potentially face more charges and the aforementioned sentence; he could make a plea bargain, probably reducing the sentence, but still not getting the attention he needs while in prison; or he could plead not guilty by reason of insanity. He entered the NGI plea.
In year eight now of our operations, we find ourselves in the middle of an interesting juxtaposition, with the Davis Enterprise taking on heavy criticism for their coverage of the Daniel Marsh trial, and the Vanguard sitting back, having made the decision that we did not have to print every graphic detail of the troubling case.
When the Vanguard argued that the courts needed to be open to the public, we did so with the principle that an open courtroom prevents the government from abusing the rights of the accused. However, we also believe that with freedom comes responsibility, and we believed that we could paint an accurate picture of the troublesome case without the graphic details.
On Sunday, September 22, 2013 from 5:00 to 7:00 PM at the West Sacramento Library located at 1212 Merkley Avenue in West Sacramento, the Vanguard Court Watch Council of Yolo County (VCWCYC) is inviting the public to come forward to express their concerns about the judicial system, provide testimony. Newly hired West Sacramento Police Chief Tom McDonald will be present to community concerns and provide information to the public.
By Catherine McKnightOn Wednesday morning the court heard closing arguments in People v. Humphrey. The state is seeking a re-extension on Casey Humphrey’s commitment at Napa State Hospital. The key question surrounding this case: “Is he a harm to others?” It is not about guilt or innocence, which Judge Paul Richardson made clear to the jury.
In his opening, DDA Gorman said that the “bottom line” is that Casey Humphrey “is apparently schizophrenic with little or no insight into his mental illness.” Because of this, he said, this makes him a substantial threat to others.
By Catherine McKnightA special proceeding jury trial began Tuesday morning in the case of People v. Humphrey. Casey Humphrey, the defendant, has been in Napa State Hospital since he was in 18 in 2002, and is eligible for release in November of this year. The people believe he is not ready to be released and still poses a “substantial threat” to others.
The court heard opening statements from Deputy District Attorney Robert Gorman and Deputy Public Defender Bret Bandley.
I have had the pleasure of getting to know the victim in this case, Mikey Partida, and his family. Everyone responds differently when the unexpected strikes and, for the Partida family, they decided to get involved in community activism to ensure that this never happens to another person.
I greatly respect Gloria Partida, the mother of Mikey Partida, and her commitment to her family and her community. I understand why they wanted to put this behind them, I understand that getting the hate crime enhancement was vitally important to them, and I understand when they say that they are at peace.
Clayton Garzon, whose brutal beating of Mikey Partida, while shouting anti-gay epithets, horrified and captivated the Davis community last spring, has plead no contest to two counts and will receive a five-year prison sentence, to be served at the Yolo County Jail.
Under the terms of the plea agreement, Mr. Garzon plead no contest to battery causing serious bodily injury and a hate crimes enhancement.
Last week we heard the testimony of Ariel Pineda, who testified that he had performed the interrogation of Daniel Marsh – who was 15 at the time of the crimes and had just turned 16 when questioned by Detective Pineda.
He testified that it was about a four-hour interrogation – it was apparently performed with an FBI agent present, but without the presence of an attorney.
Daniel Marsh Case Draws Media Scrutiny While Horrific Elder Abuse Case Draws None – The Yolo County District Attorney’s Office has a page where they have compiled the latest “high profile cases.” It’s a nice tool for the public and those interested in keeping track of the high profile cases – it has the name of the defense, the case number, the charges, and of course the next hearing date and where the case stands.
But it does raise the rather interesting question, in listing 15 cases – why are those cases high profile, covered by the media, while other cases are not? Why does the media cover some cases and not others?
Today’s over-the-top headline in the local paper, “Police: Teen Confessed to Killing Davis Couple,” leaves us with a sinking feeling in the pit of our stomachs. A few weeks ago, acting on principle, we opposed the court closing the preliminary hearing to the public.
We believe that we did the right thing, but we understand the concerns of the defense. Everything has a context, and in this case, we literally heard one side of the story without even the usual cross-examination.
by Antoinnette BorbonThe courtroom was filled today awaiting to hear what would be the beginning of the case against young Daniel Marsh. Daniel Marsh, 16, has been charged with double homicide. On April 14th, 2013, the bodies of Oliver Northup and Claudia Maupin Northup were found in their home on Cowell Blvd. Authorities were called to do a welfare check on the couple, only to discover the two deceased in their bed.
Deputy Public Defender Ron Johnson filed a motion for a continuance yesterday, stating he did not have time to listen to a 13-hour long audiotape of the interrogation of Mr. Marsh. He told Judge Fall he was not prepared and needed more time. Supervising Deputy District Attorney Michael Cabral opposed his motion.
Report Warns of Potential Dangers If Services Are Not Provided to Released Inmates – According to a report from the Stanford Three Strikes Project, the 1000th inmate has been released under the reform that overwhelming was passed by the voters in the form of Proposition 36 in 2012.
Proposition 36 offers an opportunity for eligible California prison inmates sentenced under California’s prior Three Strikes Law for non-serious, non-violent crimes to seek a sentence reduction from their sentencing courts.
When Eric Holder announced sweeping changes to the federal government’s enforcement of drug laws and its pursuit of mandatory minimums for non-violent, small quantity drug possession offenses, perhaps the biggest change came two weeks later when Mr. Holder informed the states that the government would allow the states to create a regime that would regulate and implement the ballot initiatives that legalized the use of marijuana for adults.
This is a marked contrast to how the Justice Department under Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and the first term of Barack Obama dealt with California’s medical marijuana law, where the federal government was often criticized for raiding facilities, treating terminally ill cancer patients, which dispensed marijuana under state law.
By Catherine McKnightDeputy District Attorney Deanna Hayes began her opening statement by describing the alleged victim in this case and some of the events that led up to the restraining order she ultimately sought against her husband, Juan Martinez.
By Anthony Rascon-RamosDeputy DA Refuses to Provide Name to Vanguard: In the jury trial of People v. Luna the jury reached a verdict on Tuesday morning (August 27, 2013) and found the defendant guilty on count one of possessing an illegal switch blade.
The main argument of the deputy district attorney (who declined to have her name exposed) was that the defendant’s knife was a switch blade knife because it had a spring mechanism that allowed the knife to forcefully open up with the touch of a button. On the contrary, Deputy Public Defender Ms. Aguero’s main argument, in contrast, was that the knife Mr. Luna possessed was, in fact, a pocket knife and that the way to open it was by applying pressure on the knife itself.
