Yolo County

Same Poll Finds Three Strikes Reform Passing Overwhelmingly – Last week, the LA Times-USC Poll found that support by voters to repeal the death penalty has increased dramatically, which puts the measure in range, though not enough at this point to actually ensure its passage, as support still falls below the critical 50 percent threshold.

The gap is just three points – 42 percent in favor of its passage (which would end the death penalty) and 45 percent against, with a critical 12 percent undecided.

by Ron Briggs

GUEST COMMENTARY – Bill O’Reilly is the newest endorser of Proposition 34, the initiative that will replace the death penalty with life in prison without possibility of parole and make inmates work and pay restitution (rather than sit in private cells without doing anything, as they now do).

It might be surprising to some that O’Reilly, a political commentator on Fox News, a national leader among traditional thinkers, supports Prop 34. But a look at California’s death penalty shows why: California’s death penalty is simply a fiscal disaster that coddles criminals, enriches lawyers, and hurts victims.

The first ever academic investigation into the scope and cost of wrongful convictions revealed on Wednesday that California leads the nation in wrongful convictions.

The project, California Wrongful Convictions Project, launched by the University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Berkeley Law), and Hollway Advisory Services, a criminal justice research firm, announced that their research found that at least 200 wrongful convictions have been thrown out since 1989 in California, costing those convicted more than 1,300 years of freedom and taxpayers $129 million.

ANALYSIS – Throughout the trial that seemed to stretch on far longer than the 13 calendar days it encompassed, the hope was that, win or lose, this trial would provide closure to the grieving family of Luis Gutierrez who was gunned down by plain-clothed sheriff’s deputies on April 30, 2009.

The odds from the start seemed stacked against the plaintiffs. After all, they had only three witnesses who actually saw what happened that day and none of them saw everything.  How were they going to prove this case, even at the lower civil trial level of preponderance of the evidence?

ANALYSIS – As the Federal Civil Rights Suit trial wrapped up last week, the Sacramento Bee‘s Denny Walsh does an exceptional piece in which he argues “jurors must ask: What about the knife?“

As Mr. Walsh writes, “The jury’s verdict likely will swing on whether the plaintiffs’ lawyers have sown enough doubt in jurors’ minds that Gutierrez did not have the knife when the shooting occurred.”

Did Chief Probation Officer Rist Resign Due to This Scandal? – In response to a citizen’s complaint, the Yolo County Grand Jury investigated the Yolo County Probation Department.

One of the critical questions regarding the propriety of the shooting of Luis Gutierrez on April 30, 2009 by three Yolo County Sheriff’s Deputies is the propriety of the consensual stop and encounter.  One of the persistent questions we have had is whether Mr. Gutierrez – a non-native English speaker, reasonably knew that he was running from police officers.

To answer some of these questions, the plaintiffs brought in expert Stephen L. D’Arcy, currently a Criminal Justice Department faculty member at Sacramento State and a retired undersheriff of Placer County as recently as 2007.

Juan Meléndez-Colón Speaks of Faith and Redemption and the Corrupt Justice System He Fought Against for 17 Years – It was hard to imagine that on May 2, 1984 when Juan Melendez was first arrested, not only was he wrongly accused of murder and eventually sentenced to be executed by the state of Florida, but he could neither speak or read English, other than a few swear words.

It took him 17 years, 8 months, and one day to be, not only exonerated, but to find his voice.  Despite his heavy accent, Mr. Meléndez gave a powerful and spellbinding speech for an hour on Sunday afternoon, depicting how he survived and many others, through execution or suicide or neglect, did not.

The three strikes law was a reaction to heinous crimes such as Richard Allen Davis’ murder of young Polly Klaas back in the early 1990s.  Mr. Davis was a lifetime offender who had just been released.

Three strikes laws were designed to keep those dangerous criminals locked away.  But the reality is that most of the people actually caught in this net are not the Richard Allen Davis’ of the world.

The headline reads: “Anaheim Mayor Wants Citizen Oversight of Police.”  This is the Orange County Register writing, “Mayor Tom Tait has asked the city’s top administrator to move forward with plans to establish a citizens’ committee to review police actions and misconduct allegations.  Community leaders called for such a committee over the summer after police shootings killed two Latino men and sparked weeks of unrest.”

“The time has come,” Mayor Tait said. “It would be good for the city to have a trusted group of citizens look into any allegations of misconduct.”

If attorneys for the family of Luis Gutiérrez, shot and killed in Woodland on April 30, 2009, by three Yolo County Sheriff’s Deputies, are to make their case, three independent witnesses for the plaintiffs, who witnessed various stages of the pursuit and eventual shooting, will be critical.

On Thursday, two of those critical witnesses, along with the first of the three deputies, would testify.