There was a lot of focus, this opening week of the Topete trial, on the sideshow. In the end, the point I am going to make is probably not crucial. In all likelihood Mr. Topete will get convicted on all charges and sentenced to death. After all, he shot at a police officer 17 times after leading him on a high speed chase. He had his baby in the car and he was drunk.
They can get him for first degree murder with special circumstances even under a felony murder theory. Nevertheless, since our primary focus is on the Yolo County Judicial System, it is worth making the case that I think the prosecution’s theory of the murder is partially flawed.
Earlier this week, we ran a story about the lawsuit that Attorney Stewart Katz filed on behalf of John Hesselbein.
As the suit alleges, “The immediate justification for the shooting was Hesselbein’s continued squirming after being warned that he would have ‘his grape peeled’ if he continued wriggling.”
The spectacle of the Topete trial has often distracted from the incident and brutal murder itself. This has proved to be a huge disservice to the magnitude of human tragedy that occurred here.
Yesterday Angelique Topete took the stand as a hostile witness for the prosecution. Recall that during the pretrial motions, the defense fought hard to keep her from testifying to what would normally be protected by spousal privilege. However, due to the endangerment charges regarding the couple’s child, the spousal privilege did not apply.
Judge Richardson Denies Defense Motion For Mistrial –
Given the twists and turns in the now three-year-old murder case involving Marco Topete, who faces the death penalty for shooting and killing Sheriff Deputy Tony Diaz in June of 2008, it should be no surprise that the first day of opening arguments would not run smoothly.
A vivid and horrifying 15-minute video of the chase and ultimate shooting of the deputy nearly brought the case to a halt once again, as dozens of family members began weeping openly in court in full view of the jury and one woman could be heard wailing down the hall so loudly that virtually the entire courthouse heard it.
Suit alleges a very different string of events than the one detailed by the Sacramento District Attorney’s office
Attorney Stewart Katz, representing John Hesselbein, filed a federal civil rights suit on Monday stemming from an action on January 30, 2011 where Mr. Hesselbein was shot “at point-blank range in the head with a high-powered round fired from an assault rifle while Hesselbein was seated handcuffed in the back of a patrol car.”
“The immediate justification for the shooting was Hesselbein’s continued squirming after being warned that he would have ‘his grape peeled’ if he continued wriggling,” the suit claims.
On August 1, the Yolo Judicial Watch Editorial Board wrote, “A recent study, by Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Arthur Alarcon and Loyola Law School Professor Paula Mitchell, of correctional records reveals the stunning toll that legal proceedings take on the financial resources of our state. In the face of the staggering cost of capital punishment, California can no longer afford the legal proceedings required, by law, to put a person to death.”
Two weeks later, a case that embodies the costs involved in a death penalty case began in Yolo County as Marco Topete is on trial for the 2008 shooting of Yolo County Sheriff’s Deputy Tony Diaz.
On Friday a reader commenting on the Judicial Watch article about a man convicted of first degree murder of his wife wrote, “The guy is guilty of first degree murder for the public murder of his wife and you are complaining about the 5 digit cost of his trial! Have you totally lost it? When the cost of trying capital cases is more important then [sic] justice we have completely lost our bearings as a society.”
As if to answer that question, on Saturday, the New York Times published an article that shows a reversal in the trend of “tough on crime” polices, even in conservative states.
A Yolo County jury convicted 78-year-old Donna McClure of West Sacramento of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence. Ms. McClure had driven her vehicle without a valid license and had failed to yield to a pedestrian in the parking lot of a West Sacramento Raley’s store on October 1, 2009.
As reported in a press release from the DA, Deputy District Attorney Ryan Couzens argued that Ms. McClure committed gross negligence because she had been repeatedly warned by her doctor and by the Department of Motor Vehicles that she could not safely drive, due to lapses in consciousness, judgment and attention caused by chronic alcoholism.
Deputy DA Sanctioned For Asking Improper Questions –
It was as straightforward a murder case as you will find. There were just two days of evidence in which three witnesses came forward to say that Ignacio Mendoza walked up to his wife in an orchard outside of Zamora and shot and killed her. The closing statements actually took less time in their entirety than the jury instructions.
By the end of the third day, the jury had announced that they had convicted Mr. Mendoza of the first-degree murder of his wife, as well as discharging a firearm causing great bodily injury, and attempted kidnapping.
A Yolo County jury convicted 27-year-old Noelle Warren for her role in a 2007 accident which seriously injured Jonathan Pinkerton. She was convicted of felony hit and run, causing serious permanent injury. The jury hung on the verdict for her father, 52 years old, for being an accessory to a felony for his alleged role in attempting to conceal the crime.
The jury voted 10-2 for acquittal for Lorin Warren, and the DA will decide on August 16 whether to retry the case for Mr. Warren, at the same time Judge Fall will set the date for Ms. Warren’s sentencing.
On July 30th, the Vanguard reported on a case that originated out of Davis. On May 5th, 2010 law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at a home located on the 1500 block of Cypress Lane in Davis. The search produced multiple bags of marijuana, scales and US currency. Consequently, one resident, a minor, was arrested.
In the course of their duties, law enforcement intercepted a text message sent to the minor from “Chico,” a moniker law enforcement recognized as being associated with an individual by the name of Israel Covarrubias. Mr. Covarrubias, a defendant in the aforementioned case, had allegedly offered marijuana for sale. Law enforcement, unbeknownst to Mr Covarrubias, arranged a meeting between himself and the minor in which the former would sell one ounce of marijuana. Mr. Covarrubias is alleged to have agreed to meet the minor for this purpose.
Vanguard Court Watch has analyzed newly available data on the number of prison inmates by county, and determined that Yolo County has a disproportionately high number of prison inmates compared to its size and crime rate.
According to the data, there are 3.95 persons in prison from Yolo County per 1000 people ages 18 to 64. While Yolo County ranks 20th (out of 30) in crime rate among counties with over 100,000 population (ages 18 to 64), it ranks 4th in the prison rate.
In mid-July, the Sacramento County District Attorney’s office announced it would shut down the unit in Sacramento that had independently monitored police shootings to determine whether the officers’ actions were justified and whether the investigations into them were conducted thoroughly.
It sounds like an important unit on the surface, but the office’s investigations have not resulted in a single criminal prosecution for at least a decade.
The First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco has struck down a 2004 voter initiative that took effect in 2009 that required anyone arrested on suspicion of a felony to be swabbed on an inner cheek for genetic material, which would then be forwarded to a database accessible to state and local police and the FBI.
While courts have upheld the DNA testing of those convicted of crimes, “An individual… who has not yet been the subject of a judicial determination of probable cause, falls closer to the ordinary citizen end of the continuum than one as to whom probable cause has been found by a judicial officer or grand jury,” Presiding Justice J. Anthony Kline said in the 3-0 ruling.
On Monday, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a measure that would help prevent wrongful convictions. The legislation, authored by Senator Mark Leno, ensures that no judge or jury convicts a defendant, or approves an aggravating factor in a crime that allows for a stricter penalty, based solely on the uncorroborated testimony of an in-custody informant.
The bill implements a 2006 bipartisan recommendation of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice – a law that former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger had vetoed several times, despite the fact that similar laws are in effect in at least 17 other states
In a press release issued on Tuesday, Yolo County District Attorney Jeff Reisig attempted to take full credit for a reduction in court delays that, over three years, have been reduced by nearly 20 percent according to his office. The local media dutifully reported on this, doing little to no checking with the other key players.
As one person told the Vanguard, “He is accepting full credit for something he’s only partially responsible for.” Indeed, if anyone deserves credit it might be Judge David Rosenberg who, as presiding judge, has helped to streamline the functions of Yolo Superior Court.
Pop culture brings us the classic moment at the end of Star Wars, where the aging protagonist is about to turn over the reins to his protégé. Looking at his former pupil, Obi Wan says, “You can’t win, Darth. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.”
Perhaps the more contemporary example works better, when Keith Olbermann first began his show, then on MS-NBC, and he went about attacking Bill O’Reilly who was the heavyweight of the cable political talk shows.
The worst crimes across the nation for which people have been sentenced to death have a common theme of incomprehensible cruelty and suffering inflicted on helpless people. In the face of such crimes it is hard for some to object to the death penalty.
However, a recent study, by Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Arthur Alarcon and Loyola Law School Professor Paula Mitchell, of correctional records reveals the stunning toll that legal proceedings take on the financial resources of our state. In the face of the staggering cost of capital punishment, California can no longer afford the legal proceedings required, by law, to put a person to death.
What should have been a simple case involving the sale of a single ounce of marijuana and the possession of another ounce of marijuana, has been blown into a case where the defendants are facing 13 years in prison, due to gang enhancements and gang charges.
The preliminary hearing was held on Friday in Judge Janet Gaard’s courtroom. The contention was based on the gang charges, which as we will see, seem tenuous at best. It was an unusually charged atmosphere, as this case has been dragging on for over a year. The defense attorneys have attempted in vain to get the gang charges dropped, at which point the clients apparently would be willing to plead to the transportation of marijuana charges.
Last week, five people in Yolo County were acquitted by juries, another person the jury hung on, and a seventh person was convicted but only after acquittal on the most serious charge.
Something is changing. To be very frank, we have seen much weaker prosecution cases end in convictions than the ones we saw last week.