court fines and fees

Newport Beach Judge Reduces Fines Due to Accused’s Financial Hardship

By Adrienne May Orense, Hannah BriseñoAugust 18, 2026

Judge Richard E. Pacheco, presiding at the Newport Beach Harbor Justice Center, declined to impose a probation violation on a defendant who failed to complete a nine-month First Offender Alcohol Program. The defendant attributed the non-completion to financial difficulties, leading Judge Pacheco to reduce court fees from $1,422 to $399 and grant a six-month extension for the completion of community service in lieu of outstanding financial obligations.

COURT WATCH: Santa Clara Judge Weighs Poverty, Mental Health in Sentencing, Orders Probation Instead of Additional Jail Time

By Jacqueline ParkAugust 18, 2026

A Santa Clara County Superior Court judge ordered a defendant to remain on probation and undergo mental health treatment rather than serve additional jail time, citing financial hardship and waiving non-discretionary fines and fees. The decision highlighted the impact of financial constraints on criminal sentencing and the court’s obligation under People v. Dueñas.

Court Watch: Court Orders Probation, Fines for Injured Defendant Despite Incapacity

By Kiyana ColeJune 5, 2026

Judge Richard E. Pacheco granted a Newport Beach defendant three years of informal probation and an extension for a court-ordered program, despite concerns regarding his physical condition and financial capacity to meet judicial requirements. The resolution of two criminal cases via plea agreement occurred amidst revelations of the defendant’s injury and inability to work, prompting a postponement of financial obligations that remained un-waived.