The American Bar Association has issued a formal warning that escalating political attacks targeting judges and courts across the United States pose a substantial threat to the independence of the judiciary and the foundational stability of democratic institutions, citing instances of intimidation and punitive measures directed at both judicial officers and legal practitioners.
A recent analysis published by the legal newsletter Law Dork contends that Chief Justice John Roberts continues to contribute to the perceived politicization of the U.S. Supreme Court, despite his repeated assertions of judicial neutrality, through decisions that have significantly altered constitutional interpretation and generated widespread political consequences.
The ideology of colorblindness, which seeks to ignore race, actually fosters racial inequality and hinders progress towards racial equity, while the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to remedy the legacy of slavery and promote fairness.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that incarcerated people have a right to a jury trial when they are accused of failing to file a prison grievance, if they claim they were prevented from doing so due to allegations of abuse or retaliation.
by Brett Murphy and Kirsten Berg ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The…
Here’s what past criminal law rulings tell us about how the justices may interpret the law moving…
In a narrow 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court has ruled that the US Constitution guarantees a…