Big Issues Loom in Davis For January
Depending on how things shake out, January may be one of the biggest non-election months we have had in recent memory.
Depending on how things shake out, January may be one of the biggest non-election months we have had in recent memory.
The Contra Costa Times reported in early December that Yolo County was among four counties that had not provided data at all on 2009 salaries of all judges and employees in the court. This followed a request by the Bay Area News Group to apply California’s new judiciary adopted transparency rules.
It may be recalled that the Vanguard reported on this on December 18, 2010 and asked why Yolo County was stonewalling.
By analyzing individual cases, we hoped to be able to determine, on a more systematic basis, the problems facing the Yolo Judicial system. While this report does not represent a comprehensive review of the court system or the DA’s Office, it does provide some insight into problems that we face.
Former Davis City Councilmember Ted Puntillo joined the push for Stephen Souza to become the next Mayor of Davis. We could be less than a week from finding out who will be the next mayor, but in all likelihood it will not be Mr. Souza.
The DA’s Office argued in their closing that the Broderick Boys gang represented a clear nuisance to the West Sacramento community to the extent that they needed additional remedies not already available under the law.
According to a Sunday article in the Davis Enterprise, Helen Thomson has fired back calling Jim Provenza’s accusation “a crock” and saying it was “very irritating.”
In other words, students are being asked to flip the bill so that their professors and UC administrators can retire with their full pension benefits, despite the fact that they failed to pay into the system over the last decade.
Last year, the apartment vacancy rate was 3.2 percent, and the average rent increase was 1.05 percent.
That article apparently helped tie together enough threads between Mr. Cohen’s conduct in Waterford and his conduct in South San Francisco to force his resignation on December 17, with allegations, amid among other things, that he tried to hire an old associate from Total School Solutions to a new position during a time when the school district was forced to lay off and cut salaries of teachers.
More alarming is the fast-track 14-month timeline that the city has the project slated to take, for a project that includes 610 units of housing along with 20 acres of business park. A second community forum is tentatively scheduled for January of 2011. By March of 2011, they will be into the EIR (Environmental Impact Report) preparation phase. Commissions will make their reviews in January and February of 2012, with the council taking final action by February 2012, before the next council election.
DA Reisig and his staff may be able to write off the efforts of the Vanguard, but some of his antics have caught the Sacramento press’s attention. Two of his worst offending cases – as in waste of taxpayer money – made top ten lists for the year 2010 in both the Sacramento Bee and the Sacramento News and Review.
However, the point I think that needs to be made over and over again is that democracy is not about outcomes. We could get together and figure out the best solution and impose it on the people, but that is not democracy. Democracy is about process – open process, transparent process, and sometimes messy process.
Interim City Manager Paul Navazio stressed that the city is still working out what the impact of these rate hikes will be on the city’s budget. That information should be ready to roll on January 18, when the council has their study session on pensions and the city’s unfunded liability, which is soaring with this latest report.
“In October, the Yolo County Taxpayers Association advised the school board that it would not oppose a reasonable increase in the parcel tax to preserve core educational programs,” Mr. Munn writes, but explains that would be under under certain conditions.
In the end, it was not that the council was unconcerned about the lack of public process, but rather it was that they were not concerned enough.
Faced with inadequate time to research the case, lack of hours in the law library, lack of privacy and protection for legal product, Mr. Topete finally had enough last week and reluctantly took back the two attorneys he had dismissed just three months ago.
On Monday we asked what the rush was with this water deal that necessitated a decision during the time that normally people are on vacation and spending time with their families. On Monday night, in a packed City Hall, part with citizens skeptical of the deal, the other part with consultant and water experts arguing this is our only shot, we finally got the answer: Sacramento developer Angelos Tsakopoulos was driving the deal and the deadline.
The public complaint is the speed at which this deal is progressing, the lack of time for public input and the fact that this is happening during winter break, leading many in this community to question whether those in power are not somewhat hiding the ball here, and trying to hide portions of this deal from full public inquiry.
But that is not the case this year, as last week we suddenly learned that the water process which had been moving slowly for years was suddenly rushing in a torrent. The Board of Supervisors rammed through an agreement with Angelo Tsakopoulos, a person I would not trust with someone else’s money, let alone taxpayer money.
There is a good article this morning in the Woodland Daily Democrat on the problems that the Yolo County Counsel’s Office had with responding to public records requests.
Davis operates its own water and wastewater utilities. Although a big responsibility, it affords our community the flexibility to control our destiny, manage systems that support our environmental and conservation values, and force costs down at every opportunity.