Davis’ Own Fiscal Cliff
Unfortunately, the city manager at that time did not buy into the cuts and City Manager Steve Pinkerton arrived in time for the September 6 water debacle and could not deal with massive employee cuts at the same time.
Unfortunately, the city manager at that time did not buy into the cuts and City Manager Steve Pinkerton arrived in time for the September 6 water debacle and could not deal with massive employee cuts at the same time.
The language on the ballot was as follows: “Shall the City Council’s approval of Ordinance 2259, approving the Second Street Crossing Project, a retail development of approximately 183,000 square feet, including a General Merchandise Store of 137,000 square feet and other retail buildings totaling 46,000 square feet, including a General Plan Amendment (Ordinance 2259, Exhibit A, Specific Plan Amendment (Exhibit B), Rezone (Exhibit C), and Development Agreement (Exhibit. D)) be ratified?”
Earlier this week, columnist Bob Dunning once again made an inaccurate statement: “If my water rates are locked in for a solid year based on how much water I used 12 months ago, the incentive to conserve is dramatically reduced.”
Commentary: Woodland’s Council Should Use More Caution in their Remarks – I read columnist Bob Dunning’s recent column that, in part, discussed a recent city council meeting held in Woodland where there was a brief (at least by Davis standards) update on the surface water project two days before Thanksgiving and a day before the cost-sharing agreement was announced by Councilmember Rochelle Swanson and Mayor Pro Tem Dan Wolk.
On Wednesday, the Vanguard reported that the Davis City Council unanimously decided to delay the decision on Target until their December 11, 2012 meeting. The Davis Downtown’s Co-President Michael Bisch told the council that they were willing to support the amendment to the zoning of the Target pods in exchange for help with the Gateway Project.
On a Las Vegas morning, crime investigator Gil Grissom surveyed the scene of an apparent suicide by a wealthy casino heir, dusting for prints, looking for fibers – any clue to help him and his team find the true story. Through drug analysis, fiber testing and close contact with the police, Grissom determined that the dead man was killed by his brother, who hoped to get a piece of their family’s fortune. Grissom was right. The brother confessed to the crime and was sent to prison.
Councilmember Rochelle Swanson made the motion and then said, “It is my understanding that what was once opposition is no longer opposition to this project.”
The council stopped short of committing fully to spending more than one third of a million on predevelopment planning for the Nishi property, and instead agreed to check in with staff at $100,000 or six months – whichever comes first. Brett Lee cast the lone dissenting vote.
However, perhaps feeling he owes students for pushing his tax measure over the top, the governor has taken an increasingly vigilant role on UC matters, first pressing the UC Board of Regents following the election not to raise student fees, and now criticizing a pay increase for the new UC Berkeley Chancellor.
The question is why were their backs seemingly to the wall on this? Tonight’s discussion on water has no action by the council on Loge-Williams. They will only be asked to approve the rate-sharing agreement and review the ballot language drafted on November 13.
However, within that temptation are pitfalls, particularly since the property is outside the current city limits and thus requires a Measure J vote. Traffic issues plague access on the Richards Blvd side, and access via UC Davis would require some sort of crossing above or beneath the railroad tracks.
The result was 1.4 million new voters signing up to vote and California’s number of registered voters surging to record levels, passing for the first time the 18 million mark.
Editor’s note: Matt Williams who sits as an alternate on the Water Advisory Committee and who developed along with fellow WAC member Frank Loge the Loge-Williams water rate model, responds to last week’s Bob Dunning column using a point-counterpoint approach. The Point represents Bob Dunning’s view, the Counterpoint, Matt Williams’ view.
POINT — I come not to bury the Water Advisory Committee, but to praise it … or maybe the other way around … I’m not sure … all I know is the recommendation the WAC made to the City Council about water rates is confusing in the extreme, even in a town where half the town has a Ph.D. and the other half thinks it should … the plan is one of those only-in-Davis, first-in-the-nation things that makes me wonder if it was adopted for its rationale or simply because it allows our town to stake another claim to worldwide greatness … I’m not sure I want to be a guinea pig when it comes to the cost of water …
In a report two weeks ago, KCRA in Sacramento cited that “a growing number of law enforcement officials are saying it’s time for California to overhaul realignment — and to stop dumping dangerous felons from state prison into local counties.”
The water issue is one of the most complex I have had to cover. It is not that understanding pension formulas and fiscal issues is simple. Nor is it that land use issues are straightforward. But water is another beast – there are many overlapping issues, moving parts and complexities.
No Vanguard on Thanksgiving, November 22- November 24.
One of the critical unresolved issues in the Woodland-Davis surface water project, indeed one that still could have derailed the deal, had to do with an agreement to equitably share the costs, now that the city of Davis has reduced its share from 50 percent of the project down to 40 percent of the project.