Court Watch: Mental Health Diversion Approved for Accused Facing Assault Charges

WOODLAND, Calif. — A Yolo County Superior Court judge granted a motion for mental health diversion Friday, rejecting prosecution arguments that the absence of an immediate treatment placement made the plan insufficient, and finding the accused suitable and eligible for diversion.

Judge David Rosenberg approved the diversion during a hearing despite Deputy District Attorney Adrienne Chin-Perez’s contention that there was a “lack of plan” for treatment because the accused remains on a waitlist for recommended therapy.

Deputy Public Defender Erin Dacayanan further stated that “the level of care that (the accused) requires exceeds the amount of supervision that the court can provide.”

The defense reported that the accused, facing assault charges, is a daily cannabis user and said that use could “affect the effectiveness of his antipsychotic medication,” arguing this was a reason the court could not provide a fully secure treatment plan because the issue was “not addressing” the medication’s negative implications.

The defense also emphasized that the accused’s last criminal conviction was 18 years ago. The accused completed an assessment with North American Mental Health and was recommended therapy, for which they are currently on a waitlist.

Deputy District Attorney Chin-Perez countered that the people’s concern centered on the security and legitimacy of the treatment plan. Chin-Perez stated that “we don’t even have his treatment for mental health therapy in line at this time, because there is a waitlist,” and noted that the accused had not undergone an American Society of Addiction Medicine assessment.

Despite the defense’s concerns about the lack of mental health care received to date, Chin-Perez continued by stating that the court does not have the accused’s treatment in place and that there is no “sufficient” plan to meet his mental health needs. Chin-Perez also pointed to the accused’s cannabis use.

Despite the prosecution’s resistance to mental health diversion, which the defense argued would ensure access to necessary treatment and rehabilitation, Rosenberg granted the motion, finding the accused suitable and eligible notwithstanding claims of a lack of a “secure” treatment plan.

A review hearing for the mental health diversion is set for Feb. 6 at 9 a.m.

Follow the Vanguard on Social Media – X, Instagram and FacebookSubscribe the Vanguard News letters.  To make a tax-deductible donation, please visit davisvanguard.org/donate or give directly through ActBlue.  Your support will ensure that the vital work of the Vanguard continues.

Categories:

Breaking News Court Watch Northern California Court Watch Vanguard Court Watch Yolo County

Tags:

Authors

  • Shreya Verma

    Shreya Verma is a second-year Political Science Major at the University of California, Irvine. She has previously served as an intern at the Fremont City Council, where she conducted research and co-authored a paper analyzing the impact of social issues, such as homelessness and access to education, on the community, particularly on the marginalized population. Currently, she serves as the Vice President of the Women in Law Association at UCI, Vice President of Finance for The Women's Network, and a committee director for UCI Model United Nations. Her interests include international law, human rights, and supporting underserved communities. She hopes to attend law school and work in Criminal Law in the future.

    View all posts
  • Nancy Carrillo

    Nancy Carrillo is a third-year Political Science and Sociology student at UC Davis. Throughout her academic career, she has been passionate about representing her Hispanic community, which has led her to pursue a pre-law track. Through working with The Davis Vanguard, she is determined to learn and develop as a transparent and honest writer. Outside of school, Nancy enjoys trying new coffee shops and restaurants in downtown Davis.

    View all posts

Leave a Comment