Civil rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Legal Defense Fund, have petitioned a New Hampshire federal court to reaffirm birthright citizenship protections. This action follows President Donald Trump’s issuance of a new executive order, which challenges constitutional interpretations previously upheld by the Supreme Court in the case of Trump v. Barbara.
Three Supreme Court justices have issued judicial opinions that interpret the Fourteenth Amendment in a manner diverging from its established application, which guarantees citizenship to ‘all persons born’ within U.S. jurisdiction. These perspectives have drawn criticism for effectively narrowing the amendment’s scope to exclude children of undocumented individuals, despite historical records confirming the framers’ explicit rejection of limiting its application solely to freed slaves.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed birthright citizenship for children born in the United States, irrespective of their parents’ immigration status. The 6-3 decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in Trump v. Barbara, rejected President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to narrow the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause and reaffirmed over 150 years of constitutional precedent.
President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship faces significant legal headwinds after skeptical questioning from Supreme Court justices during oral arguments, as the administration’s novel interpretation of “domicile” drew sharp scrutiny.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta believes the U.S. Supreme Court will reject efforts to limit birthright citizenship, upholding the longstanding interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark case that could redefine the meaning of citizenship in America, as justices grappled with the legality of President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for certain children born on U.S. soil.
The ACLU is defending the 14th Amendment before the Supreme Court in Trump v. Barbara, challenging an executive order that would strip birthright citizenship from infants born to immigrant parents after Feb. 19, 2025, a move the organization argues threatens a core constitutional guarantee.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship, with the case now before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Legal scholar César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández challenges the Justice Department’s defense of President Donald Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship, arguing that the US has followed broad birthright citizenship since 1868 and that the government’s framing is historically inaccurate and built on misleading global comparisons.
Families share how Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order upended their hopes, and forced them to consider early births or leaving the U.S.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for issuing an executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship, arguing that it violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
In a barrage of attacks on immigration on his first day back in office, Donald Trump issued…
WASHINGTON D.C. – A federal judge Thursday temporarily halted President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed to terminate…
Disclaimer: Opinions are those of the writer and do not reflect those of The Vanguard or its…