Report Uncovers Flaws in Parole Boards Across 35 States

NORTHAMPTON, Mass. — The Prison Policy Initiative this week released a new report, Parole in Perspective, revealing widespread flaws in how parole boards operate across at least 35 states. The study found that these boards are releasing fewer people each year, contributing to what the organization calls systemic injustice in the parole process.

The report states that “parole releases are on the decline in nearly every state that uses discretionary parole, highlighting elements of the process that contribute to this urgent problem.” It focuses on two main areas: how parole boards are structured and how their hearings are conducted. It also examines new data on hearings and grant rates, showing that “factors that boards consider — including their discretion,” directly determine whether someone is released.

The findings are based on detailed data tables compiled by the Prison Policy Initiative, or PPI. The data show differences among states not only in how hearings are held but also in how many people even get the opportunity for a hearing or a grant. Despite operating under “exact statutory text” guidelines, the report found that state parole boards interpret and apply these laws inconsistently.

Guiding texts, including a so-called “North Star” document, are intended to help policymakers make consistent and fair decisions. But according to the report, those decisions often vary widely between states, as many prioritize political or bureaucratic power over meaningful reform.

The report also highlights the deeper systemic flaws in parole systems overall. It argues that boards rely too heavily on external influences such as public perception of the crime — factors an applicant cannot control. It adds that some boards make irrational decisions to keep people incarcerated, a problem that has worsened with the shift to virtual hearings rather than in-person ones.

Report author Leah Wang wrote, “By shining a light on boards and their practices, we hope to lay a path toward making these systems real tools for decarceration.” She added, “Despite their differences, all discretionary parole systems have serious design flaws that lead to an unfair preparation and hearing process for incarcerated people.”

Follow the Vanguard on Social Media – X, Instagram and FacebookSubscribe the Vanguard News letters.  To make a tax-deductible donation, please visit davisvanguard.org/donate or give directly through ActBlue.  Your support will ensure that the vital work of the Vanguard continues.

Categories:

Breaking News Everyday Injustice

Tags:

Author

  • Mia Wagley

    Mia Wagley is a second year UC Davis student studying Community and Regional Development on a pre-law track. Through her involvement in organizations such as the Davis Pre-Law Society and Moot Court, she has discovered her passion in constitutional law, which she hopes to focus on in law school in the near future. In her free time, Mia is involved in music, as she plays drums in multiple different bands and ensembles both in and outside of school.

    View all posts

Leave a Comment