The nation’s 250th anniversary arrives amidst profound political, legal, and cultural debates concerning immigration, civil rights, economic policy, and the future of American democracy. Immigrant rights organizations are utilizing the semiquincentennial to reflect upon the nation’s progress and the persistent challenges.
Three Supreme Court justices have issued judicial opinions that interpret the Fourteenth Amendment in a manner diverging from its established application, which guarantees citizenship to ‘all persons born’ within U.S. jurisdiction. These perspectives have drawn criticism for effectively narrowing the amendment’s scope to exclude children of undocumented individuals, despite historical records confirming the framers’ explicit rejection of limiting its application solely to freed slaves.
Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have preserved birthright citizenship while expanding executive authority over asylum and humanitarian immigration protections, prompting renewed debate concerning the future of immigration law.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed birthright citizenship for children born in the United States, irrespective of their parents’ immigration status. The 6-3 decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in Trump v. Barbara, rejected President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to narrow the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause and reaffirmed over 150 years of constitutional precedent.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed an emergency petition in federal court, seeking the release of Anabella Gyasi, a pregnant woman, and her disabled toddler, whom the organization asserts are being unlawfully detained under dangerous conditions at Dulles International Airport.
President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship faces significant legal headwinds after skeptical questioning from Supreme Court justices during oral arguments, as the administration’s novel interpretation of “domicile” drew sharp scrutiny.
The Supreme Court’s oral arguments in the Trump v. Barbara birthright citizenship case revealed deep skepticism towards the Trump administration’s attempt to restrict automatic citizenship, with the justices relying heavily on constitutional text, history and precedent.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta believes the U.S. Supreme Court will reject efforts to limit birthright citizenship, upholding the longstanding interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark case that could redefine the meaning of citizenship in America, as justices grappled with the legality of President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for certain children born on U.S. soil.
The ACLU is defending the 14th Amendment before the Supreme Court in Trump v. Barbara, challenging an executive order that would strip birthright citizenship from infants born to immigrant parents after Feb. 19, 2025, a move the organization argues threatens a core constitutional guarantee.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship, with the case now before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge to President Trump’s birthright citizenship ban, which has been repeatedly blocked by lower courts as unconstitutional, according to the ACLU.
The U.S. Supreme Court has extended the date of review on President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship to Dec. 5, 2025, with multiple federal lawsuits having temporarily blocked the order from being enforced.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a nationwide injunction against President Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship, affirming the constitutional right to birthright citizenship and blocking the order from being enforced.
The Trump administration’s immigration agenda has expanded beyond the undocumented to include temporary visa holders, asylum seekers, lawful permanent residents, and naturalized citizens, resulting in a system of exclusion that undermines due process and equal protection under the Constitution.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for issuing an executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship, arguing that it violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
The ACLU is defending civil rights and civil liberties against the Trump administration’s anti-democratic threats, including attacks on birthright citizenship, mass deportation, and transgender rights.
Oakland, CA – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today issued a strong statement ahead of a crucial…
In a barrage of attacks on immigration on his first day back in office, Donald Trump issued…
San Francisco, CA – Attorney General Rob Bonta on Tuesday filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s…